• Skip to main content

Suzanne W. Churchill

  • DH Scholarship
    • Mina Loy
    • Gwendolyn Bennett
    • Modernist Magazines
  • Teaching
    • Recommendation Requests
    • Reading Tips
    • Secondary Source Reports
  • Writing
  • Painting
  • About Me
    • C.V.

Suzanne Churchill

Self-portraits in painting and poetry

September 1, 2013 by Suzanne Churchill

IMG_0998The painting on my home page is one I did when I was a senior at Middlebury College. I was doing a series of small paintings of unoccupied park benches. I was on my second or third sitting of this bench, which faces the mountains to the west of campus. When I arrived at my perch, I was annoyed to find another student painter had inserted herself between me and my vista. I decided to paint her in to my composition. Because she had the same brown pony tail and blue sweatshirt as I, everyone assumed the painting was a self-portrait. And that’s what it became.

The portrait is both me and not me, which is really what any self-portrait is. A self-portrait depicts you as someone else—someone outside your head and body, who exists on canvas, paper, or, in my case, particle board. When you look at painter’s self-portrait, you never delude yourself into think you’re actually looking at the artist himself—not even when you’re looking at a self-portrait by Rembrandt, whose flesh tones pulse with blood and whose eyes follow your gaze. What’s so astonishing about Rembrandt’s self-portraits is that, for all their life-likeness, you can never forget that you’re looking at paint, paint that has been artfully manipulated to create an illusion of proximity and personhood.

Self-portraiture in poetry is a different story. When you read a poem, it’s easy to feel like you’re reading the poet’s mind. The lyric “I” creates the illusion that you’re having an intimate encounter with the poet, who is expressing her innermost thoughts and emotions. It feels like you’re in touch with the poet herself. Our confusion is registered in the different articles we use to refer to poems and paintings: when we read a poem, we say, “that’s T. S. Eliot,” as if the poem were the poet, whereas when we see a painting, we say, “that’s a Rembrandt,” acknowledging the work as a related but separate entity.

Poetry readers should take a lesson from painting. Recognize that when you read a poem by T. S. Eliot, you’re no more in touch with Eliot himself than you are face-to-face with Rembrandt when you look at his self-portrait. When you read a poem written in the first person, you’re not reading the poet’s mind, you’re reading words, words that have been artfully manipulated to create an illusion of intimacy and personhood. Yes, the illusion bears a resemblance to the real person. But the self-portrait is not the person; it’s an artful composition.

In the same way, everything I write about myself on this blog is a form of self-portraiture. Squint carefully as you read and you can probably pick out the brush strokes.

Filed Under: Poetry, Selfhood Tagged With: painting, poetry, self-portraiture

Earth receive two honored guests

September 1, 2013 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Earth, receive an honoured guest:

William Yeats is laid to rest.

Let the Irish vessel lie

Emptied of its poetry.

– W. H. Auden, “In Memory of W. B. Yeats”

We lost two great writers recently: Elmore Leonard and Seamus Heaney. It would be hard to think of two celebrated contemporary writers whose styles differ more. American novelist Leonard wrote taught, stark, hard-boiled crime fiction that makes your heart race, while Irish poet Heaney wrote rich, sensory, densely layered poetry that makes you feel the peat between your teeth.

Full disclosure: I haven’t read Leonard’s novels yet, but his obituary in the New York Times makes me want to. His 10 rules of writing model his pithy style and tell you how to achieve it. “Try to leave out the parts that readers tend to skip,” he advises, and, “If it sounds like writing, rewrite it.”

I just broke one of Leonard’s rules by using a verb other than “said” to frame his quotations. But maybe that’s because at heart I’m a sucker for writing that sounds like writing, which is what Heaney gives us. In his defense, Heaney gives us writing that sounds like writing that sounds like “the squelch and slap / of soggy peat” and emits “the cold smell of potato mould.” His poetry is so richly sensory that it makes you aware of language as a thick loam that you can build mud castles with. Check out his poem, “Digging.”

As Leonard’s 10 rules and Heaney’s “Digging” show, one thing both writers have in common is a sense of humor. They are masters of their craft, and they have fun with it. Maybe that should be rule #11: Have fun with it.

Filed Under: All Posts, Language, Poetry Tagged With: language, poetry, rules for writing, style

2012 Holiday Letter (by Matt Churchill)

June 3, 2012 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Holiday-Letter-2012

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

2011 Holiday Letter (by Suzanne Churchill)

June 3, 2011 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Holiday-Letter-2011

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

2010 Holiday Letter (by Matt Churchill)

June 3, 2010 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Holiday-Letter-2010-draft

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

2009 Holiday Letter (by Matt Churchill)

June 3, 2009 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Holiday-Letter-2009

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

2008 Holiday Letter (by Matt Churchill)

December 23, 2008 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

December 2008

Dear Friends and Family,

I’m back!  Suzanne, with her Davidson College faculty gig, managed a full-year vacation (I mean sabbatical) in 2007 – 2008, but somehow all I finagled was a year free of holiday letter writing.  But, unfortunately for you, all good things must come to an end.

One of the benefits of aging is that you start to see all of your parenting efforts begin to bear fruit. Take Zac (age 7 and a second grader at Davidson Elementary), for example. On May 15, 2008, Suzanne received the following letter from our very responsible neighbor, Emma (age 11), who walks Zac and Emma’s sister, Tilly, home from school each day:

Dear Ms. Suzanne.  Today on the walk home Zac said a very bad word.  He said the word that starts with the 6th letter of the alphabet.  I’m sorry to have to inform you of this.

A…B…C…D…E…(uh oh).  So Suzanne pulls Zac and Luke (age 12), who are playing basketball in our driveway, into the house for an interrogation:

“Zac, I received a very disappointing letter from Emma today.  What did you say on the way home from school?”

“Ummm,” Zac replies sheepishly, “What the [sixth-letter-of-the-alphabet-word]?”

“Why in the world would you say that?”

“Well, Tilly was throwing a fit and being really mean to us and she wouldn’t stop.”

Ignoring this admittedly rational answer, Suzanne continues the interrogation: “And where did you learn that awful word?”  (Now I must admit to you, my faithful reader, that when I first heard this story, I began to feel a bit uncomfortable at this point. Fortunately, Luke came to my aid):

“From me,” Luke admits.

“And when have you been using such language?”

“When Thomas hit me in the face with a basketball really hard on purpose.”

Somewhat flummoxed, Suzanne sends Zac and Luke off to write an apology to Emma and a list of alternative phrases to use in moments of justifiable distress, which results in the following missive from Zac:

Dear Emma.  I am very sorry I said that.  I didn’t mean to.  I should of said, “What the milk.”  Love, Zac.

And a new family expression was born.

But we don’t just stop at fiery language in the Churchill household.  We go for the real fireworks as well.  This Spring Thomas (age 12) and a couple of his friends had the bright idea to light a few leaves on fire in woods owned by the DAVIDSON FIRE CHIEF.   And when the flames got a bit out of control, they had an even more ingenious idea to smother the fire with dry mulch (resulting in a visit from the DAVIDSON FIRE DEPARTMENT and the longest grounding of Thomas’ short life).  Yes, it’s been a year to make any parent proud.

While I highlight their foibles to make sure they have something to talk about someday in therapy, we actually feel very lucky to have three happy, loving, and generally responsible children.  Firestarter, I mean Thomas, has natural leadership qualities that he exercises on his soccer team and on the middle school student council.  He has a sly sense of humor, a love of animals (particularly his cat, Fergus), and strong empathy for others (hidden at times by long hair and a teenage attitude). Thomas also keeps me up-to-date on hip hop and other music trends, allowing me to repeat my mother’s famous line, “What is this noise that we’re listening to!”

Luke is usually ensconced in a pile of books, but he also finds time to be a key defender on his soccer team, a member of our town’s youth advisory council, and an architect on his school’s “Future Cities” team, which is competing to build a model of an environmentally efficient city. He’s almost as tall as Suzanne, but despite his teenage size, he’s not too cool to give great hugs. And Zac, despite his sailor’s vocabulary, is still a cheerful, fun-loving little boy who plays sports of all kinds, loves Lego and Hotwheels, and hates the UNC Tarheel basketball team with a passion almost as strong as his Dad’s. All three boys are now computer-savvy kids who have “chat” sessions with their friends that consist of exchanges like: “Yo, are you on-line?”  “Yeah, dude, s’up?”  “You rock.”  “That is so beast!”

Suzanne and I feel very fortunate to have challenging (albeit occasionally too stressful) jobs and a healthy family, and our thoughts and hearts go out to those of you who are struggling with the down economy or health issues.  We enjoyed a great California spring break trip with my brother Bruce and his partner Scott this year, visiting friends in Southern California and various “lands”:  Disneyland, Legoland, and Weird Rental House Land (the last of which I don’t necessarily recommend).  We took our annual family sojourn to New England to visit our parents and siblings, and Suzanne and I attended her 20th Middlebury reunion and my 15th Stanford Law School reunion (yes, we are getting old). Suzanne also went North in November to meet our new baby niece, Isabelle Lisette Wintsch, the daughter of her brother Jonathan and his wife Suzanne.

It seems a bit predictable to end our letter with the traditional, “Season’s Greetings.”  But, what the milk! We hope that your holidays are filled with joy and that your New Year is beast.

Lots of love,

Matt, Suzanne, Thomas, Luke and Zac

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

2007 Holiday Letter (by Suzanne Churchill)

June 3, 2007 by Suzanne Churchill Leave a Comment

Holiday-Letter-2007

Filed Under: All Posts, Holiday Letters

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in